<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.mediapost.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>MediaPost | Metrics Insider</title><link>http://www.mediapost.com/</link><description>None</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:10:03 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.mediapost.com/metrics-insider" /><feedburner:info uri="metrics-insider" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><title>Attribute That!</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/riXP7V0oUEc/attribute-that.html</link><description>Attribution modeling or path-to-purchase analysis? These concepts are often used in the same context -- and, at times, are confused with one another. The purpose of both is to establish optimal
touchpoints for consumer interaction with the brand and to optimize individual online channels to achieve the best cost savings and customer experience. So, what is the difference between the two?&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/riXP7V0oUEc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:10:03 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/200135/attribute-that.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/200135/attribute-that.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Bring On Good Measurement!</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/GRLVM_6rKEw/bring-on-good-measurement.html</link><description>Online advertisers are blinding themselves. And they're doing it on purpose. The digital channel enables us to track and gather actionable performance data virtually in real time. But we don't do it.
I'm not referring to the much-maligned click-through rate, or CTR. Even though CTR still shows up on an RFP from time to time, most of the industry has rightly downplayed the significance of the CTR
as a valid performance indicator.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/GRLVM_6rKEw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 09:31:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/199853/bring-on-good-measurement.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/199853/bring-on-good-measurement.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Better Safe Than Sorry</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/YYwApl8iB24/better-safe-than-sorry.html</link><description>After months of writing and speaking about Making Measurement Makes Sense (3MS), on my own and with esteemed colleagues from the buy and sell sides, I've learned that redundancy is actually a good
thing.  This is especially so in terms of the task at hand: changing measurement in a complex ecosystem.  While we all crave standards, demand quality and believe that digital media need to be part of
big brand allocations on a regular basis, some on the sell-side remain concerned about changing currency too quickly.  Most of the concern centers on the technological complexity of assuring stable
viewable impressions measurement for transactional purposes.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/YYwApl8iB24" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 01:12:33 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/199430/better-safe-than-sorry.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/199430/better-safe-than-sorry.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Industry Trend: Higher Expectations As Marketing Attribution Matures</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/S5k-VTDXoXc/industry-trend-higher-expectations-as-marketing-a.html</link><description>As with any service, technology, or combination of both, the expectations of the marketplace grow more sophisticated as the industry matures.  Such has been the case in the marketing attribution space
over the last 12 months, as brands, agencies, executives, media buyers and marketing analysts have all undergone an education from vendors, analyst firms and other thought leaders in the space.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/S5k-VTDXoXc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:41:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/198956/industry-trend-higher-expectations-as-marketing-a.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/198956/industry-trend-higher-expectations-as-marketing-a.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Out Of Chaos, The Path To Purchase</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/KcFOVlNqADY/out-of-chaos-the-path-to-purchase.html</link><description>There is one diagram that any marketer would be capable of sketching from memory, even after being awakened from the depths of an REM sleep cycle. It is a trapezoid with a shorter lower base -- or,
perhaps, an overturned truncated cone --featuring several rows of words such as "awareness," "consideration," "engagement," "product discovery," "purchase" and "loyalty" placed within. Recognize it?
Yes, it is the good old purchase funnel. For some marketers, this is all they remember from their MBA courses. But the industry has collectively concluded that the traditional purchase funnel is dead&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/KcFOVlNqADY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:13:22 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/198234/out-of-chaos-the-path-to-purchase.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/198234/out-of-chaos-the-path-to-purchase.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Programmatic Buying Meets Attributed Metrics: A Match Made With Big Data</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/LigRF4-5vlE/programmatic-buying-meets-attributed-metrics-a-ma.html</link><description>One of the latest trends in today's digital marketing ecosystem involves the intersection of Big Data, marketing attribution and programmatic media buying.  It's a trend that provides a glimpse of a
future where the media buying process is much more efficient, and produces results far superior to traditional buying methodologies.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/LigRF4-5vlE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:26:19 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/196687/programmatic-buying-meets-attributed-metrics-a-ma.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/196687/programmatic-buying-meets-attributed-metrics-a-ma.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Data Scientists Swim, Surf, Pick And Juggle</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/rnK47sOa5ps/data-scientists-swim-surf-pick-and-juggle.html</link><description>As mobile advertising specialists, we depend on the work of our data scientists. They're the ones who figure out exactly what our data can do for us, by applying algorithms that unlock immense value
for us and for our clients. But what exactly do data scientists do? Does their day consist of diving into deep blue oceans of data, swimming among shoals of algorithms and algebraic coral? Do they
pick away at a rock face of solid data, to find diamond insights compressed over millions of years? Do they surf data? Do they juggle it? Tame it? Ingest it? Given that I have a team of data
scientists, I thought it would be interesting to give you a taste of what they do on a daily basis. What are their challenges, and how do they overcome them?&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/rnK47sOa5ps" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:11:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/195951/data-scientists-swim-surf-pick-and-juggle.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/195951/data-scientists-swim-surf-pick-and-juggle.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>How To Become A Data-Centric Organization</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/F6nIkrTmp5Y/how-to-become-a-data-centric-organization.html</link><description>Big Data is more than just a physical presence on a server.  It requires a change in thinking, as comScore chief Gian Fulgoni hammered home in a recent blog post.  If your marketing organization isn't
prepared to accept and leverage the Big Data that's accessible to your business, chances are your competitors will.  So how does one prepare for, and align their organization to be more data-driven?
As with many challenges, the first step is identifying the roadblocks before considering a solution.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/F6nIkrTmp5Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 12:02:41 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/194946/how-to-become-a-data-centric-organization.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/194946/how-to-become-a-data-centric-organization.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Silence Is Golden</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/-JTgj03zdq4/silence-is-golden.html</link><description>It seems the notion that silence is golden has lost its luster.   As an industry, a collective collaborating to solve thorny measurement issues, we have not been tooting our horns recently.   There
has been much progress on the development of standards and testing needed to institutionalize a viewable impressions currency and then some.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/-JTgj03zdq4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:03:04 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/194004/silence-is-golden.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/194004/silence-is-golden.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Bridges Of Madison Avenue</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/py9Bu7p3Syc/the-bridges-of-madison-avenue.html</link><description>Madison Avenue today is a study in contrast. The media ecosystem has become so complicated that, just to get a general idea of what is happening in digital, social, set-top and mobile requires
supercomputers parsing Big Data terabytes. Yet for many Mad Ave residents, advertising is still a simple two-way street.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/py9Bu7p3Syc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:46:04 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/193345/the-bridges-of-madison-avenue.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/193345/the-bridges-of-madison-avenue.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Worlds Collide! Bringing Offline Data To An Online World</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/GomW5kxYU4g/worlds-collide-bringing-offline-data-to-an-online.html</link><description>One of the most complex challenges facing marketers is trying to measure and understand the impact offline or online marketing has on purchases, regardless of where they take place. A classic example
of this challenge is the difficulty in understanding the value of direct mail: Does it influence a customer to go online and make a purchase there, or ultimately in a store? How can one track it
accurately? To truly understand the impact of the entire marketing mix, businesses need to understand what advertisements those buyers were exposed to before making a purchase.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/GomW5kxYU4g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:32:53 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/193098/worlds-collide-bringing-offline-data-to-an-online.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/193098/worlds-collide-bringing-offline-data-to-an-online.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Four Traits Of A Successful Marketing Attribution Implementation</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/jGowxULmfEE/four-traits-of-a-successful-marketing-attribution.html</link><description>In the past I've written about how the implementation of a marketing attribution solution forces certain changes to be made within an organization. These changes are well worth the effort, given the
significant (15-30%) increase in return on marketing spend that organizations typically achieve through the use of attribution, not to mention the multiple non-attribution-related benefits those
changes provide.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/jGowxULmfEE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:20:49 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/191910/four-traits-of-a-successful-marketing-attribution.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/191910/four-traits-of-a-successful-marketing-attribution.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Simplify Targeting And Overcome Low Match Rates </title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/nPc_JZ6Ab4s/simplify-targeting-and-overcome-low-match-rates.html</link><description>There is an explosive hype focused on leveraging an advertiser's customer data to enable better digital media targeting.  Several approaches have sprung up over the years that attempt to individually
match customer level data to cookies for targeting ads.  These processes include matching registered users through either a persistent cookie or an email address; some simply match a customer's
personal information (PII) with permission. The match rates are not great!  Some advertisers have reported match rates as low as 10% with only 50% accuracy in identifying gender.  With low individual
match rates exacerbated by inaccuracy, advertisers should start to rethink their data strategy.  Is&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/nPc_JZ6Ab4s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 08:50:58 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/191159/simplify-targeting-and-overcome-low-match-rates.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/191159/simplify-targeting-and-overcome-low-match-rates.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>A Demon Under The Streetlight</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/CVRSDWs8tSE/a-demon-under-the-streetlight.html</link><description>There's an old joke about a man searching for his car keys at night under a streetlight instead of around the car where his keys were ostensibly lost. When asked by a passerby why he was searching
there he replies, "Because the light is better under the streetlight!"&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/CVRSDWs8tSE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:58:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/191104/a-demon-under-the-streetlight.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/191104/a-demon-under-the-streetlight.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Merry Happy Movies</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/HjvnLdKRmm8/merry-happy-movies.html</link><description>The holiday movie hype is upon us.  With the importance of movies as an advertiser category, and with entertainment accounting for $729 million in revenues in the 2012 half-year IAB Internet
Advertising Revenue report, the IAB thought it fitting to get a picture of how consumers use digital media to find out about movies and decide what to see.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/HjvnLdKRmm8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:16:52 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/189777/merry-happy-movies.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/189777/merry-happy-movies.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Marketing Attribution: A Time-To-Market Decision </title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/oda2o4LxPNw/marketing-attribution-a-time-to-market-decision.html</link><description>When planning the implementation of an attribution solution within your organization, there are numerous decisions that will affect the length of time required to complete that implementation and
begin benefiting from the insights and recommendations driven by your solution.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/oda2o4LxPNw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:08:54 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/189047/marketing-attribution-a-time-to-market-decision.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/189047/marketing-attribution-a-time-to-market-decision.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Not Every Impression Created Equal:  An Ad Served Not Necessarily Ad Viewed</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/WVpozguLmkU/not-every-impression-created-equal-an-ad-served.html</link><description>While digital advertising continues to accelerate and evolve, there's no doubt that TV retains its ability to reach large numbers of people over short periods of time. But the explosive growth of
online advertising is offering marketers and media buyers other opportunities to reach, engage and influence specific audiences, with a calculated frequency and via more touch points. Irrespective of
media, there is always a need for (new) measured metrics and standards that can help inform future campaigns and help better allocate marketing spending to most effectively reach and engage audiences.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/WVpozguLmkU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 10:37:30 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/188663/not-every-impression-created-equal-an-ad-served.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/188663/not-every-impression-created-equal-an-ad-served.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Mobile Campaign Measurement: Reality Or Figment Of Our Imagination?</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/bmGg9REvyiA/mobile-campaign-measurement-reality-or-figment-of.html</link><description>Mobile devices present an opportunity for advertisers to reach consumers anywhere in the world at any time. While marketers can sense the impact of the mobile revolution, there's no scientific
evidence to indicate whether mobile advertising drives conversions -- and if so, how?&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/bmGg9REvyiA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 10:51:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/188549/mobile-campaign-measurement-reality-or-figment-of.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/188549/mobile-campaign-measurement-reality-or-figment-of.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Clear Guidance </title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/LH1NUxxNTq8/clear-guidance.html</link><description>Since the ANA, IAB and 4A's launched Making Measurement Make Sense (3MS), a great deal of progress has been made, specifically in moving digital measurement from a "served" to "viewable" impression
standard. The Media Rating Council (MRC), is helming the shift from served to viewable ad impressions for online advertising transactions. On Nov. 14, the MRC issued its first Viewable Impression
Advisory.  The document and the efforts behind it are a monumental achievement in the history of media currency development and change.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/LH1NUxxNTq8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:55:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/188071/clear-guidance.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/188071/clear-guidance.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Marketing Attribution: A CMO&amp;#39;s Best Friend</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/NWi9V5CEzUc/marketing-attribution-a-cmos-best-friend.html</link><description>Today's CMO occupies a challenging and dynamic place in his or her organization's ecosystem.  He is accountable to the CEO for producing results - whether these results are leads, sales, brand equity
or a combination - that help achieve the company's business goals. He partners with the CRO (chief revenue officer) to implement programs that fuel the sales organization's pipeline and empower it to
close business. He is accountable to the CFO for producing those results at an acceptable cost, and must justify future budget spending based on past and predicted performance. And he manages a team
that's responsible for implementing a veritable Rubik's cube of marketing channels, campaigns and tactics designed to produce the results that his C-suite colleagues are expecting.For these reasons,
marketing attribution should be the CMO's best friend.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/NWi9V5CEzUc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:30:02 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/187219/marketing-attribution-a-cmos-best-friend.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/187219/marketing-attribution-a-cmos-best-friend.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>It&amp;#39;s Time To Toss Average Frequency Into The Bucket</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/NyW8U0UtvEk/its-time-to-toss-average-frequency-into-the-bucke.html</link><description>You are building an ad campaign. You've completed vast amounts of research, worked hard on the creative, media plan and set your goals. Now it's time to figure out frequency -- how many times a person
should see each ad. This task is extremely important. If your ad gets either too many or too few views, the whole campaign can derail. And once you've set the frequency, what is the actual probability
of meeting it?  Most premium publishers and ad exchanges claim they'll help advertisers achieve the perfect frequency target, by ensuring that the average frequency meets a set frequency cap. The key
word here is average. But is a frequency cap what you need? If you advertise with different premium publishers, how do you choose the cap for each site? How do you avoid overexposure to people
visiting more than one of those sites -- or underexposure to those visiting just one?&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/NyW8U0UtvEk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:28:24 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/185803/its-time-to-toss-average-frequency-into-the-bucke.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/185803/its-time-to-toss-average-frequency-into-the-bucke.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>How To Calculate Attribution&amp;#39;s ROI: The Formula</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/epDy98DeSXw/how-to-calculate-attributions-roi-the-formula.html</link><description>A question that frequently arises when brands or agencies consider an investment in a marketing attribution solution is how to calculate the return on that investment.  Of course, advertisers also
tend to realize many incalculable benefits once they implement attribution, including (but not limited to) a stronger faith in the accuracy of their overall measurement practice,  a third party
accountability layer to evaluate all media partners, and installing the cornerstone of a fully data-driven marketing practice, but fiscal decisions do often require fiscal answers.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/epDy98DeSXw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:52:58 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/185313/how-to-calculate-attributions-roi-the-formula.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/185313/how-to-calculate-attributions-roi-the-formula.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Three Simple Steps You Can Take Today To Improve Media Buying   </title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/uBCkfQ-L61A/three-simple-steps-you-can-take-today-to-improve-m.html</link><description>Every election year, the topic of dirty attack ads comes up. Pundits chastise candidates about the advertisements and everyone agrees that politics would be better if candidates focused on positive
messages. Yet negative political ads live on despite the finger-wagging. Why? Because campaigns have looked at the history of attack ads and carefully monitored their results using very sophisticated
approaches. And the data shows they work. Trying to figure out which ads are most effective is not just a goal of political candidates but of marketers as well. But whether marketers are measuring the
wrong things or not considering enough factors, media buying has traditionally been based on poor or misleading metrics.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/uBCkfQ-L61A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 10:03:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/184795/three-simple-steps-you-can-take-today-to-improve-m.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/184795/three-simple-steps-you-can-take-today-to-improve-m.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Modeling Behavior To Target Smarter</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/zyu4YVKMz4A/modeling-behavior-to-target-smarter.html</link><description>Most online marketers now embrace behavioral-based targeting. As more and more marketers focused their online budgets to target based on behavior, the price for specific behaviors became more and more
expensive.  Automakers began paying top dollar for any user who visited an automotive site; they paid even higher premiums if users visited multiple sites on several occasions. The truth is that a lot
of these tracked users are well underway to engage with the brand and are likely to convert anyway -- in short, they'll buy no matter what.   If that's the case, then marketers focused exclusively on
behavioral targeting may be spending their time and money in vain.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/zyu4YVKMz4A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:17:25 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/184471/modeling-behavior-to-target-smarter.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/184471/modeling-behavior-to-target-smarter.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Overlap Reporting And Advanced Attribution</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/xzWh0KHdyY0/overlap-reporting-and-advanced-attribution.html</link><description>In an effort to maximize conversion rates, today's online marketers take advantage of myriad channels and ad types to reach their customers. They also employ a number of cross-channel strategies to
reach users at more moments of purchase consideration, increasing awareness and the probability of conversion -- but that also makes managing and optimizing campaigns increasingly complex. This leads
advertisers to wonder, "How much is too much?" That question is answered by attribution-based overlap reporting.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/xzWh0KHdyY0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:10:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/183761/overlap-reporting-and-advanced-attribution.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/183761/overlap-reporting-and-advanced-attribution.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Attribute This</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/HO8H9Bn5Dnc/attribute-this.html</link><description>To paraphrase the tagline used in commercials by Ally Bank: "Even children know it takes more than a single ad to convert a prospect."  When optimizing online campaigns, the overwhelming majority of
advertisers still credit only the last ad event that occurred prior to the conversion. That last event is typically in the form of exposure to a display banner or a click on a paid search link. This
is usually referred to as the 'last ad' model.  Some advertisers will only attribute credit to an ad if it was clicked - the 'last click' model. It's no wonder, then, that every third post on this
blog seems to be about "attribution."&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/HO8H9Bn5Dnc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:26:23 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/183220/attribute-this.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/183220/attribute-this.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Implementing Attribution Requires Change</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/8w13HCtiRms/implementing-attribution-requires-change.html</link><description>For those of you thinking about attribution management solutions, one of the most important things to know before beginning your evaluation process is that marketing attribution measurement will
significantly change the practice of marketing within your organization.  Unlike other technologies, attribution is not just a piece of software that sits in a corner and is pulled out every now and
then to solve a specific issue or meet an ad hoc need.   It's a tool that you will live and breathe with every day.  But even the easiest to learn, use and navigate attribution software will need to
be operationalized within your organization, and that's not necessarily a simple matter.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/8w13HCtiRms" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:24:52 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/182700/implementing-attribution-requires-change.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/182700/implementing-attribution-requires-change.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Facts, Findings, Figures Aren&amp;#39;t Enough  </title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/8oi2R1oFJN8/facts-findings-figures-arent-enough.html</link><description>Every day new facts, findings, figures, and pronouncements fill my inbox.   However, very few insights make it there. So many studies, so much data and so many findings abound, but it seems that it's
hard to boil it all down into truly useful intelligence.  Even when the findings and figures appear to have been collected using appropriate methodologies, more often than not, my reaction is "This is
really interesting -- but what does it mean?"&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/8oi2R1oFJN8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:23:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/182396/facts-findings-figures-arent-enough.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/182396/facts-findings-figures-arent-enough.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Hyper-Local &amp;amp; Mobile Data Demystified</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/qaRBGo0xHkU/hyper-local-mobile-data-demystified.html</link><description>For the last decade hyper-local ads were the next big thing. Today, thanks to the proliferation of smartphones and a maturing mobile marketplace, advertisers can reach consumers with a level of
location granularity that enables a new form of storytelling. These types of campaigns are now real, but understanding the nuances of location data and the privacy implications are key to running a
successful campaign. To understand these nuances, we have suggested four questions you should ask to make the most of hyper-local and mobile marketing opportunities.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/qaRBGo0xHkU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:10:30 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/182202/hyper-local-mobile-data-demystified.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/182202/hyper-local-mobile-data-demystified.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Bring On The Social Media Impression</title><link>http://feeds.mediapost.com/~r/metrics-insider/~3/UOR-gwv_XuM/bring-on-the-social-media-impression.html</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The uncertainty about the future of Facebook has a lot to do with the uncertainty about its metrics.&amp;nbsp; If &amp;ldquo;social&amp;rdquo; -- the mentions of brands and recommendations from friends and
companies --&amp;nbsp; is indeed the future of the online advertising business, it is about time we come up with media-like standard metrics to plan and evaluate social advertising.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Although
there&amp;rsquo;s no shortage of measurement companies in social media, such standards are yet to emerge.&amp;nbsp; The increased curiosity of marketers about social networking gave birth to hundreds of
"listening" research vendors that perfected the art of monitoring discussion volumes and delivering dashboards centered on posts and mentions of specific issues or brands. The number of times a brand
or company is mentioned in blogs, on Facebook or Twitter is generally of interest to advertisers, especially when supplemented with sophisticated sentiment analysis that discerns positive brand
mentions from the negative.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Alas, this number cannot be used for planning, buying and optimizing campaigns. It&amp;rsquo;s time to stop merely counting the posts and bring in the &lt;strong&gt;social
media impression&lt;/strong&gt;. The industry is ripe, and all that&amp;rsquo;s needed is to connect listening tools with metered panel data. While a listening platform records a single post on your brand, that
mention is actually read/seen by X number of people.&amp;nbsp; That number is the count of social impressions for that post. Calculating this for all brand mentions will give an idea of the total social
impressions recorded for your brand, which we can compare to the volume of paid impressions.&amp;nbsp; By matching that data to the panel for de-duplication, demographics and psychographics, the social
media data can complement the campaign opportunity-to-see measures with "social media GRPs."&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The "liking" of a brand on Facebook is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; an impression; it is an engagement metric.
Seeing a "like" posted by &lt;em&gt;someone else&lt;/em&gt;, however, is more like being served an impression -- broadcasted by someone who has a high affinity for a brand. Although "liking" is largely unique to
Facebook, the same model can be extended to Twitter and LinkedIn followers, along with those who check in with a location based social network such as Foursquare.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The next step would be to
discern the value of such GRPs/impressions. One method to assign a value to your earned social media activity would be to estimate how much it would cost to deliver the same volume of impressions
through a paid media campaign.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;A good average CPM value might be the CPM of ad networks in the paid media campaign, since the site mix could be a good proxy for the earned media site
mix.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;This calculation could be a useful first step to assess the value of social exposure relative to other media activity. It can sometimes be overly simplistic, however, to equalize social
media impression with that of paid media. While a paid media buy comes with various assurances as to where the impression will run, an earned social media impression might be just the 73rd comment on
an article. Moreover, while paid media are almost always casting the brand in a positive light, this is not true in social content, where negative consumer feedback is common. So certain adjustments,
weights and normalizations are required before a social media impression becomes more like a usual impression.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;An alternative method will be to estimate the value of &amp;nbsp;social media
impressions in terms of ROI. The most robust (but also most complex and time-consuming) approach would be to create a marketing mix model to explain variations in sales for a brand. This will allow us
to understand the impact of all factors that combine to drive sales (e.g., distribution, promotions, advertising, economic factors) and the interaction between them. These results would allow us to
see the impact of social media on sales, but also see the dual impact of paid media investment through driving sales directly, and also by driving online buzz.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/metrics-insider/~4/UOR-gwv_XuM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:01:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/181839/bring-on-the-social-media-impression.html</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/181839/bring-on-the-social-media-impression.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
